Trading Beyond the Matrix

I’d like to recommend a new book on trading psychology just published by Van Tharp. I began reading it Sunday night and the book goes far deeper than any trading psychology book I’ve ever read.

Also, one of our Chairman’s Club Members is featured in Chapter 2 and it’s always great to see success like this gentleman is having.
If you are looking to improve your trading, buy this book.

Trading Beyond the Matrix: The Red Pill for Traders and Investors
Van Tharp

http://www.amazon.com/Trading-Beyond-Matrix-Traders-Investors/dp/1118525…

The Death of Intra-day Reversals?

If you speak to enough traders, you’ll hear a general consensus that the market has changed the past few years, especially last year.

High volatility securities which used to mean revert, didn’t do so as much last year. Rotational strategies in S&P stocks and high quality stocks, like the Rotational strategies found in The Machine had extraordinary years in 2012, far surpassing the index averages. I can list more examples of this but as many people have seen, it was a year which buy and hold returned, bonds were king, quality was in, and trading reversals was not.

One of the metrics I’d like to share with you to further understand the market over the past year is the following.

We ran the following test. We looked at SPY every day from 1995 -2011 and asked, how many times was SPY up (down) ½% intraday and then reversed and close down (up) for the day. Here are the statistics:

Symbol Start Date End Date Intraday Reversals- Down (%) Intraday Reversals- Up (%)
SPY 1995-01-01 2011-12-31 12.56 12.84

On average over the 17 year period, whenever SPY had moved at least 1/2 % intra-day versus the previous days close, it then reversed to close in the opposite direction just over 12.5% of the time.

We then looked at the same data from 2012. And now you’ll see why so many traders are saying “2012 felt different”. In fact it was.

Symbol Start Date End Date Intraday Reversals- Down (%) Intraday Reversals- Up (%)
SPY 2012-01-01 2012-12-31 6.00 8.00

As you can see, intra-day reversals to the downside were cut in half. To the upside it was appoximately 40% lower.

There are three possible reasons for this.

1. Volatility was down.

Yes, volatility was down but if there were many years volatility was as low or lower. 2005 and 2006 are examples.

2. Markets have changed. Intra-day reversals have been squeezed by less leverage in the marketplace, high-frequency trading, an abundance of cash in the system caused by Fed easing, etc.

At this point, I’m not buying into this. In early 2007 we heard the same excuses as to why low volatility was permanent. That lasted until everyone bought into this and the last dollar got levered up. And then reality set-in.

3. 2012 was different but in the long run, market behavior evens out.

If you look at markets over many years, behavior tends to average itself out. The best example is the outsized gains of the 90’s were averaged out by the lack of gains in the 2000’s. Combining them together looked more in line with historical returns. And the same will likely occur when it comes to intra-day reversals. Eventually, (possibly very soon) you’ll see an abundance of them.

Obviously those traders who said 2012 felt different are right. It was different. Intra-day reversals are just one of many things that were different. But, if you buy into belief that market behavior eventually averages itself out (it reverts to its long term mean) then over time the market will again move back to its ways of swinging intra-day. And strategies which rely upon this behavior will again be the big winners. If you have strategies which trade intra-day and rely upon intra-day reversals, you may want to keep an eye on them. Because if their behavior begins reverting to its mean, they’re going to potentially have a big run sometime in the near future.

Hedgehogging

Somehow along the way I didn’t get a chance to read Barton Biggs classic book Hedgehogging until this past week. What a gem. If you’re interested in getting inside the minds of one of the great market strategists of all time, this book is for you. What’s amazing, in hindsight, is that this diary starts with him opening his own hedge fund…at the age of 70!

Highly recommended.

http://www.amazon.com/Hedgehogging-ebook/dp/B0086I1Z2U/ref=tmm_kin_title…

The Missing Risk Premium: Why Low Volatility Investing Works

I read ½ this book over the past three evenings and it’s great. Anything Eric Falkenstein writes is well researched and always well written and this book should be read by everyone. I’m going to write a review on Amazon about it but in the meantime, it’s very much worth purchasing for your investment and trading library.

The Missing Risk Premium: Why Low Volatility Investing Works
Eric G. Falkenstein

http://www.amazon.com/The-Missing-Risk-Premium-Volatility/dp/1470110970

The Only 5 Trading Days That Matter

In 2004, we published on the TradingMarkets website test results showing the that the majority of the gains each month were coming from the last 5 days of trading for the month. We then went further and published the updated results in our book “Short-Term Trading Strategies That Work”.

This “end-of-the-month” phenomena was first brought to my attention by Kevin Haggerty in the 1990’s. At the time, Kevin was the Head of Trading for Fidelity Capital Markets and still to this day rates as one of the smartest traders I know. Kevin pointed out to me back then that money managers would pile into stocks at the end of the month for a multitude of reasons including anticipating cash coming in from monthly contributions people made to their retirement’s plans held by the mutual funds.

Once he pointed it out to me I saw this behavior over and over again each month, especially during the bull market years.

In 2004 we decided to run test results around it and just as Kevin stated, we statistically saw the phenomena was real.

Over the next few years this behavior became widely accepted on Wall Street and of course once something becomes widely accepted on Wall Street, it tends to stop working. And that’s what happened for a couple of years in 2009 and 2010. But in 2011 and up through this year (through July), the end-of-the month phenomena has returned and is again in full force.

For the first 7 months of 2012, simply buying the S&P (via SPY) on the fifth trading day before the end of the month and selling it on the close on the last trading day of the month gave you approximately 100% of this year’s gains. Yes, that’s right, 35 days of work have provided 100% of the gains.

In 2011 it was even better. The year ended relatively quiet for the S&P. But not the last five trading days. When the S&P was above the 200-day moving average (an uptrend) those last 5 day’s of the month accounted for returns of over 11% versus a small loss for the S&P. Someone working only 60 days in 2011 outperformed over 98% of the fund managers in the United Stated by applying this strategy!

There are some caveats to this.

1. What’s happened in the past doesn’t mean it will happen in the future.

2. This is not bullet-proof. It stopped working for a few years before it started working again the past 1 ½ years. Would it be something I’d put all my money into? Not a chance. Is this something that I’m aware of and would take into account with my trading? Yes. When a trader of Kevin Haggerty’s stature see’s it in the 90’s and it’s then tested and proven in 2004, and it’s still occurring years later, it needs to be factored into trading decision.

The” End-of the Month Phenomena” is alive and well. We’ll see if it continues in the future but for now, it’s working just as it’s worked for the past two decades.

PS – I’m happy to announce that we will be holding our 1st Quantified Options Trading Strategies Summit on August 25. As far as we know, this is the first time a quantified options trading event has ever been held. If you’re interested in learning more about the 1st Quantified Options Trading Strategies Summit, please click here.